<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Best Of The Web Blog Directory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tidalwavemedia.com/blog/best-of-the-web-blog-directory.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tidalwavemedia.com/blog/best-of-the-web-blog-directory.htm</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization, Search Engine Marketing, Internet Advertising, Link Building, and Much More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: conybutt</title>
		<link>http://www.tidalwavemedia.com/blog/best-of-the-web-blog-directory.htm/comment-page-1#comment-50672</link>
		<dc:creator>conybutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonhendricks.com/anything-else/best-of-the-web-adds-blog-directory/#comment-50672</guid>
		<description>thanks for this, I will submit my blog soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for this, I will submit my blog soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Hendricks</title>
		<link>http://www.tidalwavemedia.com/blog/best-of-the-web-blog-directory.htm/comment-page-1#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Hendricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonhendricks.com/anything-else/best-of-the-web-adds-blog-directory/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Thanks Greg, just giving you a hard time about the sixth-month minimum requirement. It is a great qualifier, I definitely appreciate your focus on quality, and I&#039;ll continue blogging away in the hopes of being accepted in a few months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Greg, just giving you a hard time about the sixth-month minimum requirement. It is a great qualifier, I definitely appreciate your focus on quality, and I&#8217;ll continue blogging away in the hopes of being accepted in a few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg hartnett</title>
		<link>http://www.tidalwavemedia.com/blog/best-of-the-web-blog-directory.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>greg hartnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonhendricks.com/anything-else/best-of-the-web-adds-blog-directory/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>hi jason:

thanks for taking the time to post about the BOTW Blog Directory.  

as is the case with all BOTW products and services, we are completely focused on, and committed to, quality and relevancy.  in keeping with this mantra, one fairly easy qualifier for us in the editorial review process is the length of time the blog has been around.  dave sifry of technorati reported in August that blogs were being created at a rate of one every three seconds - and only 55% of those new blogs were still active 3 months later - http://www.technorati.com/weblog/2005/08/34.html.  it is typically a good indicator that blogs with posts of six months or longer are more committed to posting quality information. so for those bloggers who have blogs that are less than six months old, i&#039;d say keep on posting, and remember to submit to BOTW when you hit the six month mark.  

&gt;&gt;the site owners regularly attend marketing events and are fun to party with as Iâ€™ve found out on a few occasions.

ha!  i can neither confirm nor deny any of these rumors ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi jason:</p>
<p>thanks for taking the time to post about the BOTW Blog Directory.  </p>
<p>as is the case with all BOTW products and services, we are completely focused on, and committed to, quality and relevancy.  in keeping with this mantra, one fairly easy qualifier for us in the editorial review process is the length of time the blog has been around.  dave sifry of technorati reported in August that blogs were being created at a rate of one every three seconds &#8211; and only 55% of those new blogs were still active 3 months later &#8211; <a href="http://www.technorati.com/weblog/2005/08/34.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.technorati.com/weblog/2005/08/34.html</a>.  it is typically a good indicator that blogs with posts of six months or longer are more committed to posting quality information. so for those bloggers who have blogs that are less than six months old, i&#8217;d say keep on posting, and remember to submit to BOTW when you hit the six month mark.  </p>
<p>&gt;&gt;the site owners regularly attend marketing events and are fun to party with as Iâ€™ve found out on a few occasions.</p>
<p>ha!  i can neither confirm nor deny any of these rumors <img src='http://www.tidalwavemedia.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

